Saturday, April 14, 2007

Peter, Paul and Tom

These photos were posted earlier. But, seeing this story I decided to post them again. Not bad for a citizen journalist, huh? Not an exclusive, because they all knew. And we know who they are or do we? Tom, I mean Councilperson, Tom Smith is in good position for being pro downtown development wouldn't you think? But they know this? They know each other. Its the workers the voters who don't come into the city that don't have a clue.



Who benefits? Not the taxpayers, but how about self-interest of elected officials.
The key to selling upper-floor housing is the view: the skyline, the rivers, the expanse,” said District President Dan Carmody, who hopes the forthcoming “Downtown Loft Competition” will whet the public’s supposedly healthy appetite for urban life. A study last year by a New Jersey consultant concluded that up to 3,750 households annually would prefer to live downtown.

Smith thought much the same thing 18 years ago when he spent about $70,000 to buy and remodel the gutted second floor of a 130-year-old brick building just around the corner from the Columbia Street “Landing,” Fort Wayne’s first designated historic district. His example failed to spark a downtown residential renaissance, however. With the exception of 104 condominiums built as part of the city’s Midtown Crossing project in the late 1980s, few apartments or condominiums have been added since – despite a wealth of vacant upper floors.

This summer, however, work will begin converting some of those spaces into apartments, some with outdoor balconies or rooftop decks similar to Smith’s. One of the Downtown Improvement District’s lofts will be developed immediately above Smith’s.

Another will be above 817 S. Calhoun St., and two above 916 S. Calhoun.

Carmody expects each project to cost about $125,000, with the city providing about 40 percent, banks 40 percent and the district 20 percent. Each would be repaid through rental income. Property owners will cover some costs, too, including taxes and insurance.


Loft Competition is what they call this. Wonder who these folks are that gets $125,000 a piece dropped in their collective laps?

And all the property owners has to do is collect the rent and pay taxes and insurance. That's not a bad deal, but who got to bid on such fantastic deals that mines and your tax dollars are paying for. Better yet, I am wondering who sold the businesses to these fellows. Oh believe me, women are not the benefactors of these deals. It's a man world, says the late James Brown. But we know it wouldn't..

Speaking of housewives, honey have you seen the March tax bill in the mail? No, you say. Well, you know why, that Harrison Square Project will have to pass before they are going to let you see those bills. June is when you will see the first installment of your tax bill. By then, you will have kept folks in office and the Harrison Project would be a done deal.

We must pay a lot of taxes. Because we are giving away a little over a half of million dollars to four landlords. We will provide another $57.98 million dollars to a time shared space. We will exempt two landlord from property taxes totaling over $6 million dollars. And the current tax rate used is lower than mines. The projection in the fiscal analyse list a tax rate at 2.62 and mines is 3.4662.

No saving for me, my property value was increased at the same time as the tax rate increase, wiping out the the reduction that was provided by the state. If it happened to me, you can bet your bottom dollar the same has happen to you. Go on go look at that tax bill. Look at it. And just wait untill you get the tax bill in June !! No saving, but the elected official stabilized the amount they could take rather than meeting their budget needs.

Do you now why Fort Wayne is called the dumbest city? We have people working full time to craft lofty lies to rob Peter to give to Paul. Peter may have good ideas, but Paul is too busy making sure the gravy train does not leave him stuck in downtown.

6 comments:

  1. Anonymous4/14/2007

    Credo:

    You stopped quoting the article where it was convenient for you - how about posting the rest? Particularly this salient part:

    “I always thought it would be nice to have living units on the upper floors, but I never wanted to make the (financial) commitment,” said attorney Larry Shine, owner of 916 S. Calhoun. Even if Shine pays higher taxes and doesn’t receive any rent until the construction loans are repaid, he figures it’s still a good deal.

    and...

    The lofts will be apartments initially, Carmody said, but may be available for purchase as condos later – at which point Shine and other owners would be rewarded for their participation. The property owners could also buy out the construction loans at any time and reclaim control of the improved property, Carmody said.

    Your omission of these facts is egregious.

    That part of the article makes it fairly clear that:

    1.) Those apartment owners are going to be paying higher taxes with no real cash flow benefit, until the construction loan is repaid.

    2.) Those apartment owners are essentially paying for the reconstruction, because they don't reclaim control of the improved property until the construction loan is repaid (either eventually through the lease, or through their own cash).

    P.S. The full article, readers, can be found here .

    Jeff

    ReplyDelete
  2. Forgot to make my link. Thanks for coming over, Jeff. I will go back and place a link in the story.

    No they won't be paying higher taxes, Jeff. That's they other good deal. Thanks for pointing that out.

    If this Harrison deal go through,the value of that property will pay for any cost they will have to repay.

    The story gives us a backdrop to check out the facts, I don't believe the story has all the real facts.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous4/14/2007

    Credo,

    You are speedy on the reply! I thought I would have time for dinner before your reply would come.

    Regarding the higher taxes, perhaps I am missing something - but that article implies that the property owner is paying the taxes, as well as insurance, while the rental income goes to pay for the improvement:

    Carmody expects each project to cost about $125,000, with the city providing about 40 percent, banks 40 percent and the district 20 percent. Each would be repaid through rental income. Property owners will cover some costs, too, including taxes and insurance.

    And increased property values due to H.S. would serve to increase those property taxes more, right?

    I honestly think most of the people involved in the H.S. deal really do have the interests of the city at heart.

    Jeff

    P.S. My previous post was a bit snippy. I apologize for that Credo - sorry.

    P.P.S. What is up with the snow?!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jeff:

    "Regarding the higher taxes, perhaps I am missing something - but that article implies that the property owner is paying the taxes, as well as insurance, while the rental income goes to pay for the improvement."

    Yes you are missing something, if you allow only the newspaper to inform you. But you are not alone. So many folks are missing stuff, because they rely on others to tell them.

    The saying goes, ignorance of the law is no excuse, when you have violated a law that you may have not been unaware..it is no defense.

    I share this with you to say, you are a smart cookie..but you are working with a bunch of folks whom jobs is to be smarter than you.

    I spent more than 10 months on this blog sharing my own insights and information that I was blessed to have been exposed to from over 100 or more legal students.

    I am not the enemy. I get stuff wrong. And I am counting on others in the know to point me in the right direction. Not misinformation, and outright lies.

    Go to FWOB were folks are posting that know numbers, know the cost of buildings. Kelty knows what it cost to built a building, that's his job. Does Nelson know? He has to rely on an honest person. Schoaff knows building and numbers, he laid it for all to see. Go to AWB site and see how people are pulling up signs to impact other voters decisions. Why? What madness is this?

    Are these adults? Are these adults who appears to have our or our children best interest at heart?

    A CPA states 2 billion dollars in debt..egregious!!!

    These folks are playing politics, they are leaving a legacy that no man should be proud of.

    Jason and Chris is fort wayne heroes. These two fat cat is willing to spend millions of dollars where none of the folks locally were willing spend money "down there."

    And while they are funding the new fort wayne, what happens to the old fort wayne. What happens to the taxpayers, the single moms, the children, the working families?

    Who cares about these folks?

    If Harrison Square was all that and bag of chips, it would have happened. Now it has to happen. The city has bought up all the land and they need to sell it.

    Snippy..as long as there is no name calling I can handle those who disagree with me.

    Enjoy your dinner.

    P.S. I hope we don't get a blizzard.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Credo, I read your post the other day and I have to admit I was impressed you had that out there. Want to have some fun? Go to this link and look up addresses around the Harrison Square project and see who owns them and their current assessed value.

    I did so many searches it told me I had to wait a day to come back to do more.

    Snow sucks.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes, the information is out there. But most folks are trying to take care of their families. Not standing over adults making sure they do the right thing.

    That's law enforcement jobs.

    ReplyDelete