Friday, July 13, 2007

Shaming-District Attorney David McDade of Georgia

This comes from skeptical brotha
Hat Tip: By SHANNON McCAFFREY, Associated Press Writer

District Attorney David McDade has handed out some 35 copies of a video of teenagers having sex at a party.

McDade says Georgia’s open-records law leaves him no choice but to release the footage because it was evidence in one of the state’s most turbulent cases — that of Genarlow Wilson, a young man serving 10 years in prison for having oral sex with a girl when they were teenagers.

McDade’s actions have opened him up to accusations that he is vindictively misusing his authority to keep Wilson behind bars — and worse, distributing child pornography.

“This has been a ferocious, vindictive prosecution of Genarlow Wilson,” said state Sen. Vincent Fort, an Atlanta Democrat. “What is going on is a vendetta.”

McDade, who is district attorney in Douglas County, in suburban Atlanta, did not immediately return calls Thursday.

He has said that while the law required him to release the video, he also believes the footage helps his case — by showing that Wilson is not the squeaky-clean football star and honor student portrayed by his supporters.

“Most of those who do not want people to see the tape know that it’s damning to their position,” McDade told The Associated Press.

He released the video after receiving an open records request from the AP, and said he has given it to about three dozen people, including reporters, lawmakers and several members of the public who requested it.

It shows Wilson, then 17, receiving oral sex from a 15-year-old girl and having intercourse with another 17-year-old girl. It was shot at a 2003 New Year’s Eve Party at a hotel room by another partygoer.

Earlier this week, Georgia’s chief federal prosecutor, U.S. Attorney David Nahmias, said the video “constitutes child pornography under federal law,” and he called on McDade’s office to stop releasing copies.

“These laws are intended to protect the children depicted in such images from the ongoing victimization of having their sexual activity viewed by others,” Nahmias said.

Nahmias’ office refused to say whether he would bring criminal charges against the D.A.

Critics say that at the very least, McDade should have obscured the faces of the underage girls to conceal their identity, or sought a protective order to keep the material under seal.

Such steps are common in sex abuses cases, especially those involving underage victims, said Diane Moyer, legal director for the Pennsylvania-based National Sexual Violence Research Center.

“The bottom line is we need to have respect for the victims in these kinds of cases,” Moyer said. “To release this kind of thing, to me it’s prurient and it takes the open records law too far.”

Several Wilson supporters likened McDade to disgraced Duke lacrosse prosecutor Mike Nifong and called on Georgia’s attorney general to investigate.

“Mike Nifong lost his license, and if he lost his license, then certainly a district attorney that distributes child pornography ought to be investigated,” the Rev. Raphael Warnock, pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta, said Thursday.

State Sen. Emanuel Jones said he would introduce legislation to block district attorneys from handing over photographic images in sex cases.

“I’m going to call it the David McDade Act,” Jones said. “Sometimes we have to protect our kids from district attorneys.”

Wilson was convicted of aggravated child molestation for having oral sex with the 15-year-old girl. He has served more than two years of a mandatory 10-year sentence.

The law Wilson was convicted of breaking made consensual oral sex between teens a felony. It has since been changed by the Georgia Legislature. But the state’s courts have held that the new law cannot be applied retroactively.

A judge last month called Wilson’s sentence “a grave miscarriage of justice” and ordered him set free. But prosecutors are trying to block his release. The Georgia Supreme Court is set to hear the case next week.

McDade fought a bill in the Legislature earlier this year that would have helped Wilson. Some lawmakers who were on the fence changed their mind after seeing the tape.

6 comments:

  1. McDade seems to have a little NIFONG in his system. Hopefully, McDade will experience the same career outcome!

    peace, Villager

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous2/19/2008

    David McDouche bag... oops I mean McDade, is at it again! He has wrongfully charged Stephen Reed of Marietta ga with child abuse. McDade has just been served with the major federal lawsuit from Stephen concerning this issue. Please go to www.myspace.com/justiceforstephenreed to read more about the case and to see the actual lawsuit itself... yellow links titled "complaint" and "shocking exhibits". LETS BRING MCDADE'S CAREER TO AN END!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous2/25/2008

    anything new on the Mcdade law suit? I want to see the sob get what he deserves!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous2/25/2008

    As for the Reed case not all evidence is being presented on their webpage, only the stuff that makes the others look bad. It’s like picking pieces out of the bible and forming your own religion. There are always two sides to the story. In this case, three sides possibly 4 or 5 sides!

    Visit their myspace page, read about the people involved, research the people they mention, look at their pages too! You will see some of the sides.

    McDade did his job and still continues to do it. When citizens get involved in situations that are not handled appropriately it’s called “Citizen Concern for the Safety of a Child”. Not a personal vendetta. Things have been settled for over 2 years and this Ms. Ashley Reed Crawford seems to want to keep the kettle stirred. This isn’t good for the child in the center of this controversy. The birth mother has her and doesn’t need anymore drama in their lives. It’s ashamed that she and her children will be subjected to all of this stupidity.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ms. Reed,
    Name calling is the most immature way to show the true ignorance of one's self!

    This civil court case is not about the child, its about whether your brother is guilty of the crime that he was CHARGED with and the people involved with his charges. Leave the child out of this, she is an innocent victim. Let her and her mother live their lives happily without dragging them back into the court system!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Innocent By Stander7/07/2009

    The above situation stated by Ms. Reed was resolved. The man that she so strongly stated was wrongfully charged plead GUILTY to lesser crimes of Simple Battery to a child and Criminal Damage to property after evidence was presented prior to trial. Her slanderous remarks made about the foster family were so uncalled for!

    ReplyDelete