In the interest of a child: Mary and Steve Harvey's son

I searched the web high and low unable to find the pending litigation against Mary Harvey. So, I had to wait until the Court released its ruling for an injunction against Mary Harvey. Probably why I couldn't find it, it reads likea juvenile hearing in the best interest of Wynton Harvey, son of Mary and Steve Harvey. In which in most cases information is not disclosed concerning minor children. In this case involving a minor child, a temporary injunction was issued against Mary Harvey. In addition, she was issued an order to restrain from discussing the sealed case or releasing any documents from the sealed case.

It appears that the Judge found issues with some of the statements release by Mary were not accurate and left room for misinterpretation, putting Steve Harvey and his new family in a bad light. And the Judge used the temporary injunction to set the record straight and allowed the order to be published by Steve's representative. Nothing in the order addressed the accuracy of the documents that were on display in SuperMary Harvey YouTube videos. Both Steve and Mary are silenced until a scheduled hearing requesting sanctions against parties found in violation of the original gag order is held on March 10. 2011.

"The Court finds Movant BRODERICK S. HARVEY’S relief is granted. Further, the Court finds that: Respondent MARY LEE HARVEY was not homeless or evicted from her home and was awarded three (3) homes in the property settlement;

Movant BRODERICK S. HARVEY did not take, whithold or turn the child against Respondent, MARY LEE HARVEY.;

Respondent, MARY LEE HARVEY willingly placed the child on an airplane and sent him to MR. HARVEY without his knowledge;

Movant, Broderick S.. Harvey has primary custody of the 13 year old child; Movant Broderick S. Harvey did not take Mary Lee Harvey’s wealth.;

Respondent Mary Lee Harvey received $40,000.00 per month from Movant Broderick S. Harvey to March, 2009;

Respondent Mary Lee Harvey received $1.5 million* from Movant Broderick S. Harvey in March, 2009;

and the 2005 divorce was granted on irreconcilable differences and current wife was not apart of the original divorce proceeding nor was she a cause of the marital breakup."

So my question is did Mary only receive *$1.5 million in settlement after she went back to court after finding out she was duped in the original divorce proceeding and did not get an upfront $10 million cash settlement?