Racism is not about looks-its about discrimination

The journal-gazette runs an article about the incident at DePauw from the Associated Press. The article, Image discrimination: ‘The new racism’ discusses DePauw sorority evicting certain women from their sorority was simply about looks and had nothing to do with race. Even with the fact that one of the women was an African-American. This is a subtle way of making race irrelevant. The article suggest that folks are discriminated against based on their appearance and racial discrimination has ended!

But Rachel Pappas, a DePauw junior who was among several other members who left in protest, finds that hard to believe – and calls discrimination based on image “the new racism.”

“When you look at all these things and see that all of them have been eliminated, you wonder what it could be other than the image issue,” Pappas says.

.

Racial discrimination is placed in the background by society. Issues of racial discrimination are not discussed because it culturally acceptable in different circle. So silence protects the outing of these traditional practices that still exist today.

Indiana Law Blog posted about the law of Interracial dating. Interracial dating was forbidden in certain states including Indiana during the late 1960's. Now what does that mean? That means an African-American and a raced white were not permitted to date each other. This was the law. This law was enforced at home and in the social setting for young folks, school, churches. That means children were taught you can not date. I did not say anything about marriage. You could not like each other based on your race. This was the law of the land until 1965. This law was to maintain the southern way of life, Abraham lincoln's free, separate but not equal.

Loving

highlight the fact that laws were used to control how raced whites and African-Americans were limited in how they interacted with one another. Those who did decide to break the law would go to jail or have to flee those states that forbid miscegenation to prevent going to jail. To love and marriage in such union was criminal. Indiana Law blog used the article to highlight what is going on in the gay community. Not the same, same sex unions discrimination include African-Americans. The same sex battle is based on redefining who can marriage. That marriage is defined as a union between a man and woman.

In the court case Loving was between a man and woman. If man and woman could marriage, how could the law denied these two from marrying? It was race. From Loving,

There is patently no legitimate overriding purpose independent of invidious racial discrimination which justifies this classification. The fact that Virginia prohibits only interracial marriages involving white persons demonstrates that the racial classifications must stand on their own justification, as measures designed to maintain White Supremacy.

But African-Americans are to be stupid enough to go to the back of the line and fight for same sex marriage, while so many are telling them, shut up about racial discrimination.

Now we know all about Lincoln freeing the slaves. We know all about blacks getting the right to sit at counters. But families a little over 40 years ago was telling their children they could not date outside their race. Yes African Americans could go to school with raced whites, but you better not think about liking one another. From Loving,

Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix."

The subtleties of racial discrimination. On the blog, one blogger explained that the children from marrying outside of the race would be problematic. No, it is continuation of the old law that is held in the hearts of many raced whites when it comes to African-Americans.

This one of the reason why many raced whites chose not to live among African-Americans. Many raced whites tolerate African-Americans but they do not wish to integrate totally with African-Americans. Many races whites can go to lunch with African-Americans but they will not cross into the homes of each other. Many raced white has friends who are African-Americans who serve as window dressing friends. Someone who they can take to event requiring a diversity discourse.


It is truly acceptable to discriminate against African-American. Yes, it is against the law. But look at the majority of those who are enforcing the laws.

Racial animosity is notable, as on Where the hell am I post, for those who are not trying to tell African-Americans they need to go to the back of the line. This post weighs in on a writer who feels free to express in a magazine why he hates blacks. Disagree is one thing, hate. Who hates? You probably won't be able to find the actual article on AsianWeek, but it's posted out there. Because you can easily find hate for African-Americans throughout the blogosphere.

Racial discriminate is so indoctrinated in the America culture that is has a special protection. that special protection seal has been penetrated by gender bias and is not is trying to be penetrated by same sex advocate. But nothing is like racial discrimination.

Allen County Legal Experts go Technicial bans cellphones

I was wondering why the inaugural ceremony was held on Friday, before the end of the year, could it had been because of the upcoming ban on cells phone starting Monday, January 1, 2007? According to Fort Wayne.Com, "The Allen County Courthouse; the Bud Meeks Justice Center where misdemeanor and traffic court is conducted; the Allen County Juvenile Center; and the Courthouse Annex which is where the Small Claims Division is located" will no longer permit cell phones in their buildings.

That's right, violators of the cellphone ban appearing at the metal detectors of these buildings will be punished by being stripped of their cellphones, that is if they want to remain in the buildings. We all know the real reason why cellphones are no longer allowed in the courthouse. Control. The judges are ticked that folks will not turn their ghetto fabulous toys completely off when they enter their courtrooms. I don't care what lies the papers are telling. Cameras in the courtroom ? Cameras are banned in the courthouse. Why not simply ban cellphones with cameras. Come on people, work with me. Just blame it on the real brain drain..or brain dead.


Cellphones ringing in the courtrooms is such a punch in the gut toward the arrogant judicial authorities who demand nonperson behavior from those who stand before them in the courtroom. That the only way to get back at these violators is to punish those malcontents who forget they are nonpersons when they enter the courthouse. So these influential folks will control these nonlegal actors of the courtroom at the point of entry by taking away their cellphones. Wait, not quite everyone, the court's family members when they enter the courthouse can bring in their cellphones. Ain't that special.

Well maybe not all their family members work for the court system, but it seems like it. Anyways, these folks may bring their cellphones to work. This is oh so not such a big surprise that an exception is irked out for the employees and attorneys. Just more evidence, these folks are evil, when it comes to the practice of favoritism. This time this act of kindness is aimed at their special employees to excuse the presence of a unauthorized cellphone in the courthouse. "The only exceptions to the new rule will be for attorneys with court-issued identification cards and county employpresenceees with their proper county identification badges", according to the article.

But why? Why do working folks on the job need their cellphones??? Why?

The workers are the very ones who do not need cellphones at work. And do you need to know the reason why? Because they are suppose to be on the clock working, right? Duh!Well, it must not be because, guess who gets to keep their cellphones? Who are these workers calling? Surely it's not ghostbusters or each other, you think? Personal conversations during working hours,hmmm??? And are we to believe that attorneys don't forget to turn off their phone? Ha!!!

What about emergency, like the one that occurred at the Indystar? Where a person died because a call may not have been made quick enough. Who plans a heart attack? But, it sure would be nice to have available a cellphone, especially if caught in that crazy place called a temple. “Our building and courts across the country are called temples of justice,” Allen Superior Judge Fran Gull said. “The reason it’s akin to temples is because of the solemnity of things going on. 'Cough' 'choke' 'gag' Does that really mean solidarity against the people by being rude and having disdain against the habits of the people? Another reason, the courts personnel simply is not too bright on identifying whether or not a cell phone is a cellphone or a stun gun perpetrating as a cellphone, but let's call it an issue of safety. Sounds good,huh!

So, who made such a crazy rule, "The Board of Judges, which includes all the superior and circuit court judges, makes that decision, and so far has denied official requests from the Allen County Courthouse Preservation Trust Board of Directors as well as a local doctor who provides services to the court.", according to the Fort Wayne.Com.


What's next? Will they require the citizenry to take the stairs reserving the elevators for judges and their workers in fear that judges and their workers will come in contact with folks they have mistreated? I'm telling you brain dead, I mean brain drain in the Allen County Courthouse.