Sunday, September 17, 2006

Fort Wayne's NAACP Executive Director, Michael Latham Announces NO STRIKE for Wal-Mart


According to a source, Rev. Michael Latham, Executive Director of the NAACP, Fort Wayne, Indiana announced there will be no strike at the new Southtown Centre Wal-Mart. Latham rallied the troops to support marketing manager John Wolf by shopping at supposedly the largest Wal-Mart in the State of Indiana. With a parade of African-Americans workers on stage as a symbolic commitment by Wal-Mart to the southside with this display representing over 51% of Wal-Mart employees. In response, the audience gave a thundering round of a applause for Rev. Latham's heroic effort in getting Wal-Mart to buckle so early to the people's demands.

Wait a minute, I thought, demands had something to do with self-check-out lanes for its clients, the lack of a layaway at the store during the greatest spending spree season from October to December, for shoppers, last but not least, the issue of discrimination? All that has come to a shrieking halt based on the tiny offering that the store will have over 51% of his employees represented by the African-American community or the inclusion of other groups.?!! Come on now people, this is 2007, what about demanding more than token placement? What about managers and training programs to capture the population of African-Americans that make up over 90% of the population on the southside?

But more important, what about the CReED dollars that will be lost from those who will shop at the stores with layaways on the northside. Surely Rev. Latham was aware of this lost of revenue for redevelopment on the southside when he accepted the measly offer of limited employment, and smarter than just simply agreeing to a wink, smile, and a limp handshake. Southtown Centre is a CReED district meant to capture "increases in Sales and Income Taxes generated by the investment must be used by the local government for infrastructure and improvements within the district. " This information If not, surely had he talked with the council person who represents the southside, would have supported his boycott, maybe?

The media knew it was a CReED district and the issue did not come up. Did the media play Rev. Latham stupid by focusing on the layaway issue and not have to response to the discriminating impact of redirecting dollars that was targeted for the southside in the building of the Wal-Mart?
Instead of keeping the spotlight on Wal-Mart, which has a history of not doing right by the southside community, he has turned the platoon around and find a new target for the NAACP, Baba Akan, (formerly known as Carl Johnson, Fort Wayne Community Schools Board member.

Does not Rev. Latham know that this is a diversion tactic Superintendent Wendy Robinson, nor Baba Akan are the target? The puppet master is using him as a pawn to go after the huge hunk of money that is with the school system and which schools will be left standing. Does not Rev. Latham understand that it's never about improving our community but about the money and where it will be spent?

Shame on him.

This information comes from the City of Fort Wayne, Indiana webpage about Southtown Centre CReED was unable to link:

"Community Revitalization Enhancement Districts (CReED)
Designed to assist cities in overcoming significant obstacles to downtown development
Legislation allows 1st and 2nd class cities, with a CReED to designate one additional CReED. Indiana Code 36-7-13.
25% Investor Tax Credit for Qualified Investment. (Qualified Investment: the taxpayer's expenditures for redevelopment or rehabilitation of property located in the CReED and made under an adopted CReED plan.) Does not include cost of real property or equipment. Indiana Code Section 6-3.1-19.
For the Investor:
Dept. of Commerce approves and determines eligible portion of investment before project begins.
Except in certain approved expansion/relocation circumstances, the Tax Credit is disallowed if the investor substantially reduces or ceases operations in Indiana in order to relocate operation within the CReED.
The Taxpayer claims the credit on the taxpayer's annual state income tax return. If credit exceeds state tax liability, the taxpayer may carry the excess over to subsequent taxable years.
For the Local Government:
Capture of up to $750,000 Downtown / $1,000,000 Southtown annually in sales and income tax increment
Duration of the district designation is a maximum of 15 years, beginning with receipt of first increment.
Captured increases in Sales and Income Taxes generated by the investment must be used by the local government for infrastructure and improvements within the district. "

14 comments:

  1. Anonymous9/17/2006

    It seems your biggest issue is the lack of lay aways. Can I ax you a question? When was the last time you put something on lay away?

    ReplyDelete
  2. It seems your biggest issue is the lack of lay aways. Can I ax you a question? When was the last time you put something on lay away?

    Turkette (or wannabe), ever lived Southeast? Of course not. The majority of residents there want the same life that we have out here in Aboite. I know. I grew up there, and lived there until 2005.

    Lay-away is a popular means of buying ahead for people who have little credit or means. You belittle these folks for their status. Shame on you. . .

    ReplyDelete
  3. From what I can tell by everything I have read and heard in news reports, it appears to me that Wal-Mart has put much thought into their store policies through market data research and the overall success/failure rate of specific services provided to customers within their stores. I really have a hard time thinking they would implement such policies in 27 stores nationwide just so they could discriminate against one particular portion of an area in northern Indiana. Doesn't quite make sense to me!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jessica rabbit, there are many issues about the refusal to allow the layaway on the southside until they discontinue at ALL of Wal-Mart stores. In doing so, improvements for the area will come dollars generated from these sales. This will reduce the need to increase the homeowners' property tax.

    Furthermore, keeping a layway will provide more job opportunities for those living south, as well as to prevent folks from having to use the store credit cards which will carry a higher interest rate on purchases.

    The Christmas season will soon begin, and many families use layaways to budget their spending avoiding the high interest rate of credit cards.

    I would think leadership would promote staying out of debt by pushing for Wal-Mart to offer the service for this short period of time. Fairness, simply fairness

    The issue is fairness, and if what is not available for one, can be viewed as discriminatory. Wal-Mart can make it happens if they are listening to the people.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I understand the concept of layaway and why many stores are finding that the use of it is somewhat outdated.

    Let's try this little concept on for size...considering the biggest shopping season of the year is quickly approaching on all of us. Lawaway basically "saves" the items you want until you have given them enough money to be able to own them yourself, correct? There was a time when supply and demand did not always come through for the holiday season, thus making it necessary to purchase items early, just to make sure you could get that hard to get item for a special someone, yes? In the last few years, save for the play station craze perhaps, it seems manufacturers have pretty much conquered the concept of supply and demand and we are a society that can get what we want when we want it. Yes?

    So.....what if? You were to sit down and plan your holiday budget and determine what you need to have and figure out your own layaway plan. Knowing the laws of supply and demand are pretty much right on target now and you can shop even on December 24... What if you put 10 per cent of that money in savings? An interest bearing savings account! Someone will pay you to use your money until you need it (or have saved enough) for your purchases! Hmmmm....wouldn't that do a lot for the economy and property taxes to?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Oops, posted a bit quickly, need to clarify, after you make your deposit into a savings account of just 10%, each week you would add another "payment" - just like layaway - but continue to earn interest in the process.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Jessica rabbit some had used the concept of saving. However, we are talking about those who use the layaways and will use the layaways of the other Wal-Marts, while the southtown will not offer this to that part of town. Simple..layaway is being offered at other stores, offer layaway at southtown.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I give. Common sense has nothing to do with nothing in the world you live in. Its all about discrimination in your eyes. So I can see where it would be wise to drive to the other end of town to use layaway at a different store to prove your point rather than drive to the bank and earn a little extra money...sigh

    ReplyDelete
  9. I like layaway. It is especially good for one-of-a-kind items, the ones you come upon when you're cash poor, but want to buy. But even Wal*Mart and Target don't have all the same stuff 24/7. Yes, you can save up. I do both: save up, and also use layaway.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous9/19/2006

    Jessica--

    Saving is a concept created by white raced robber barons in the dawn of the Industrial Age to hoard the working man and womans monies and use it for their own means, giving back a pittance of what they earned by way of interests.

    What part of this discrimnatory practice by white raced men don't you understand?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous9/19/2006

    A lot of banks used to offer "savings clubs" whereby you could place money in a layaway-type fund for that "rainy day", or the holiday season....
    Did that just go away too, or what?
    To me, there are just too many other ways to get what you either want OR need to justify one or two employees working the layaway counter. Better to have those two employees as CASHIERS instead to handle the long lines at the checkout.

    Besides, companies (other than Wal-Mart) all over the nation are doing away with this practice...so there must be something to it, don't you think?

    B.G.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Well B.G. those were great clubs back in the day. But many banks do not want to deal with the poor and have ended such programs. I used to work at several banks, and you could open a christmas club account to save for the holiday.
    Now that was a good program.

    I do think there is something to doing away with layaways...the eliminations of jobs. I was at a Wal-Mart in Virginia and lines at the layaway counter was long.

    Here's another take, there is a one time fee for layaways, but the interest rate is higher for the store credit card. Now if you were a business man and you wanted to take a customer for the most money which would you offer your client? Of course it would be the store credit card and not the layaway limited one time fee.

    I wanted to insure that I got a Martha Stewart complete collection, so since I didn't have the money to pay for it all at once, I put it in the layaway.

    A company can run its business anyway it wants but to refuse to offer services at one location is pure discrimination.

    I am sure you know, that some businesses will not deliver or serve in a certain part of the city. They are allowed to get away with based on employee safety. But by not having the layaway (whch is still available) is not an issue of safety but discrimination.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous9/19/2006

    Well...I suppose that makes layaways AS discriminatory as the example concerning those "upscale auto" dealers that won't let ME even take a "test drive" because *I* don't make SIX figures a year or wear an ARMANI suit (sorry...Men's Wearhouse...lol)!

    My solution...I go somewhere ELSE for a car....their loss becomes MY gain.

    Same can be said regarding Wal-Mart...if anyone doesn't like it, they can try to find a better place to shop (like the north stores).

    Taking away money from ONE location can speak volumes...as it did when the South side K-Mart was one on those branches that DID STAY OPEN (thanks to southside buying power).

    I don't advocate a boycott....just some common sense and practical application thereof.

    The whole issue is a two-edged sword really, and we have to be careful how we balance ourselves along that blade.

    B.G.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Exactly on taking your money elsewhere, but not on the northside, maybe other stores that offer layaways on the southside, like K-Mart.

    ReplyDelete