

Council person Tom Smith and a picture of his condo on Harrison Street.
Hey is that close to the new development?
Yep.
career influencer, investigator, legal researcher and advisor to business and non profit start ups.


April 14, 1992 – Corcoran’s parents found shot to death in Steuben County.
Nov. 16, 1992 – Corcoran is acquitted in those deaths.
July 26, 1997 – Corcoran shoots and kills his brother, his sister’s fiance, and two others at a Bayer Avenue home in Fort Wayne.
May 22, 1999 – Corcoran is convicted of four counts of murder.
May 25, 1999 – Jury recommends Corcoran be put to death.
Aug. 26, 1999 – Allen Superior Judge Fran Gull sentences Corcoran to death.
Dec. 6, 2000 – Indiana Supreme Court affirms Corcoran’s conviction but vacates the death penalty, sending it back for a more specific sentencing order.
Dec. 21, 2000 – Judge Gull issues a revised sentencing order, again sentencing Corcoran to death.
Sept. 5, 2002 – The Indiana Supreme Court affirms Corcoran’s conviction 5-0 and his death sentence 4-1.
Dec. 19, 2003 – Judge Gull notifies the Indiana Supreme Court that she has found Corcoran competent and that he does not wish to file a petition for post-conviction relief.
Jan. 7, 2004 – Corcoran’s public defender files appeal, claiming Corcoran was incompetent to waive his appeal rights.
May 12, 2005 – Indiana Supreme Court finds Corcoran competent to waive his appeal rights.
Nov. 8, 2005 – Petition filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, asking for a stay of Corcoran’s execution date and the court to reconsider the sentence.
April 9, 2007 – U.S. District Judge Allen Sharp issues his opinion, overturning the death sentence and ordering Corcoran be sentenced within 120 days to a term other than death.

ASHBURN, Ga. (AP) - Breaking from tradition, high school students in this small town are getting together for this year's prom.
Prom night at Turner County High has long been an evening of de facto segregation: white students organized their own unofficial prom, while black students did the same.
This year's group of seniors didn't want that legacy. When the four senior class officers - two whites and two blacks - met with principal Chad Stone at the start of the school year, they had more on their minds than changes to the school's dress code.
They wanted an all-school prom. They wanted everyone invited.
On April 21, they'll have their wish. The town's auditorium will be transformed into a tropical scene, and for the first time, every junior and senior, regardless of race, will be invited.
The prom's theme: Breakaway.
"Everybody says that's just how it's always been. It's just the way of this very small town," said James Hall, a 17-year-old black student who is the senior class president.
"But it's time for a change."
It is more than the Rutgers women's basketball team. It is all women's athletes. It is all women," said Stringer, the third-winningest women's basketball coach of all time who has taken three teams to the Final Four.
Rutgers' athletic director, Robert E. Mulcahy III, thought a meeting with Imus would offer the team's players a chance to listen to him and hear what he has to say. Several players said they wanted to ask the host why he would make such thoughtless statements.
"It kind of scars us. We grew up in a world where racism exists, and there's nothing we can do to change that," said Matee Ajavon, a junior guard. "I think that this has scarred me for life.", according to a Forbes article.
"We just hope to come to some type of understanding of what the remarks really entailed," said team captain Essence Carson. "We [would] just like to express our great hurt … the sadness that [this] has brought to us."
We're kicking off this collaboration with a new campaign celebrating the special relationship between Mothers and Daughters -- and not just biological mothers and daughters, but the special bond between women of different ages, including mentors, and aunts, and grandmothers, and godmothers, and older friends.
The motivation behind this campaign is our belief that there is no better gift we can give our daughters to help inoculate them from all the negative and soul-sapping messages our culture is bombarding them with than giving them something to care about besides themselves.
Imbuing our daughters with a sense of social responsibility is important not just for the obvious reason that caring for others is a good thing, but because making a difference in the world -- however tiny -- is the antidote to the pervasive narcissism of our consumption-crazed culture. Children brought up to feel that their lives have a larger purpose are more likely to keep their own troubles in perspective and less likely to fall into drugs or other self-destructive behaviors.
America is plagued with disconnections -- blacks from whites, rich from poor, and, perhaps most troubling, parents from children. One of the greatest ways to bridge these divides is by teaching children from an early age the importance of making service an integral part of their lives. It helps them to move from the fear of not being popular to the satisfaction of being useful.


Congratulation on achieving academic excellence! In recognition of your scholastic achievement in the College of Commerce at DePaul University, you will be honored and acknowledged at our Freshman/Sophomore Honors Convocation.
The top 5% of the freshman class and the top 10% of the sophomore class are invited to receive this recognition of scholastic achievement.



Imus made his remark the day after the Rutgers team, which includes eight black women, lost the NCAA women's championship game to Tennessee. He was speaking with producer Bernard McGuirk and said "that's some rough girls from Rutgers. Man, they got tattoos ..."
"Some hardcore hos," McGuirk said.
"That's some nappy-headed hos there, I'm going to tell you that," Imus
said.
Imus could be in real danger if the outcry causes advertisers to shy away from him, said Tom Taylor, editor of the trade publication Inside Radio. The National Organization for Women is also seeking Imus' ouster.
I thought I had heard everything from the "shock jocks," but the statements made about the Rutgers players by Don Imus and Bernard McGuirk after the NCAA championship game hit a new low.
My disgust at the statements of Imus and McGuirk are exceeded only by my outrage that nothing has been done beyond a weak "apology" and a promise to watch the show more closely.
The Rutgers team worked hard and played hard, rising to compete in the national women's collegiate basketball championship.
These players deserve better from us, and from you, than hateful and insulting remarks.
Racism and sexism have no place on the air.
I ask you to take immediate action to remove both Don Imus and Bernard McGuirk from any role that permits them to continue spewing hatred and bigotry over the airwaves.
He pointed to his involvement with the Imus Ranch, a working cattle ranch for children with cancer and blood disorders in New Mexico. Ten percent of the children who come to the ranch are black, he said.
"I'm not a white man who doesn't know any African-Americans," he said.
Imus said he hoped to meet the Rutgers players and their parents and coaches, and that he was grateful for the appearance on Sharpton's nationally syndicated show.
Karen Mateo, a spokeswoman for CBS Radio _ Imus' employer and the owner of his New York radio home, WFAN-AM _ said the company was "disappointed" in Imus' actions and characterized his comments as "completely inappropriate."I wonder when was the last time, Imus called her a ho?
The symbol represents a concern many share in the blogosphere. Different concerns, but a common theme, a divide in the community. None of these movements function effectively when the focus is on catering to the diverse needs of those enlisted in the ranks; the diversity can be acknowledged and supported, but a shared purpose must, for maximum effectiveness, remain the point of concentration. The common assumption that political action should be based on a fully shared–even identical–set of values and perspectives among those committed to a cause isn’t a good operational guide for effective organizing.
Within a given movement, differences are bound to exist among the rank and file in regard to class, race, gender, age, geographical location, religious belief and so on. But when those differences become the prime focus of attention, the energy that should be saved for working against a common oppressor gets diverted and sapped. To form powerful, effective political organizations, individuals cannot be allowed to let the differences that separate them usurp the agenda.
One central reason movements for social reform in this country have rapidly run aground is our commitment to the ideological belief (not the practice) of the supreme importance of the individual

I found the article and comments informative.
Thanks for the link to the “scholarly” paper. The paper did answer a question I had about African-American bloggers. Who is blogging? Although the sample was very small, it was interesting to learn the ages of 20-49, gender males, education master to law in the sampling.
I strongly disagree with the finding on discrimination, from my own experience. Plus, have had several bloggers express a degree of discrimination toward them
based simply on the assumption they are African-Americans or writing about topics about African-Americans.
I found it interesting that two of the bloggers cobb and prometheus 6 participated in the survey. Which suggest to me that the blackosphere is really small or they have a wide reaching audience.
Interesting I write about Women and blogging and Spencer Overton over on BlackProf writes about the email usage among African-Americans. An email posted on the BlackProf spread like wildfire through the email community. Overton ask the question,
While there are a number of successful African American blogs, why does email continue to be such a big driver of political discourse in the African American community?
Well, let's see email is pretty much free. Yahoo and other makes it pretty simple to set up an email.
Once someone sends you something to read, with a click of the mouse you can send it to another person, effortless.
If they get an email that is from a friend or family marked urgent, it is sent to everyone they know. And if you check the chain mail list and find a friend or family member name missing you send it to the next person.
It's easy to get away with sending stuff on email on the job.
Email spam is easy to do when you are bored.
Email does not require you to know how to write.
Now blogging.
Blogging can be time consuming.
Blogging requires you to write.
Blogging requires you to post
Blogging may cost you money.
Blogging may require you to have your own computer.
I would suggest that many bloggers are young technically savvy folks.
Of course blogging does not require either, but that's my take.
I also believe many African-Americans bloggers are college students.
I suggest that the young students use myspace.
Email generation tend to be older African-Americans are unwillingly to give up time to learn about utilizing the internet beyond being a consumers. Many of the younger generation are using IM or texts on their cellphone. Blogging reaches a broader network than the more personal email.
A few more possible reasons why some Black folks aren't sharing their ideas with the whole world via popular Black-focused blogs?
THE TOO SMART TYPE
Some people believe they are too advanced to involve themselves in the good blog conversations my fellow commentators and I often have in these threads. Engaging us would be a waste of their time or would require them to spend to much time educating us.
THE LEISURE-LESS TYPE
Then there are some who would like to, but simply have too little time to mix it up with us in these blog threads. Those who do have too little time to contribute to our conversations make me even more grateful for the fact that I do have a few leisure hours each week I can afford to spend on these blog conversations. I'd hate to be so burdened by my labors and familial obligations that I would not be able to devote a few hours per week to engaging smart Black folks in these digital conversations.
THE TIMID TYPE
There are some whose skins are not quite thick enough to engage others in argumentative exchanges. And things can get aggressive on the best blogs, where some of the best commentators share their controversial ideas. Some are so afraid of an antagonistic rhetorical environment or an embarrassing confirmation that they got something completely wrong that they simply avoid these potentially traumatizing events by staying quiet.
THE CAUTIOUS ACADEMIC TYPE
There is also the type whose livelihood or self-esteem depends upon others believing he or she is exceptionally erudite, authoritatively scholarly, or incapable of making silly mistakes. These types are often careful not to share their unstudied ideas. Perhaps, they think they have too much to lose. Indeed, every time I see a lengthy (more than 100 words), unedited, unstudied, and controversial comment by a professional scholar in a blog thread, I view it as an act of courage and confidence.
THE DISCOURAGED BY BIG CROWDS TYPE
I suspect there are some who won't comment in a thread after a few dozen folks have packed it full of dozens of comments. Perhaps some believe that because so many conversations and debates have already begun or finished in the thread, too few folks are likely to pay attention to their comments. The threads that get filled up with dozens of comments quickest (the controversial political and cultural posts usually get a lot of attention here) might discourage these types.
EMAILS AS SHIELDS
Emails shield the fearful from widespread professional or social embarrassment, traumatizing blows to their self-esteem, disillusionment concerning their erudition, or simply having to deal with smart strangers' opposing viewpoints. Sharing one's speech via a blog, in ways that actually cause one to risk having a smart person disagree or expose an error, probably causes some to tremble in fear.
When we started blackprof.com in September 2005 we appreciated the various attributes of blogs, and we suspected that blogs would eventually play a critical role in African American debate. How far are we from that tipping point? I don’t know. I continue to believe that it will happen. But for now, I think that email plays a constructive role in African American political discourse, and I’m thankful for that.
I guess calling sista nappy headed hos is worse than calling them B**ch and hos.Or does it matter who does the name calling, for determining if there a villain to attack ? Don Imus will appear on Rev. Al Sharpton's radio show. Sharpton wants Imus fired, but its okay for Imus to first appear on Sharpton's show. Rating, sistas and brothas, don't even turn on the radio.